Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

PC: Google

Is the Philippines PH a poor 3rd world or 4th world country forever and forever?

There are some books that just…suck!

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

After delay, man accused of killing Jonathan Joss released from jail - San Antonio Express-News

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

PC: Google

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

Will Colapinto replace Doohan as second driver at Alpine Team during the 2025 season or is just a rumour of Argentine press?

PC: The Guardian

PC: Google

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Tesla, GM, Blueprint Medicines, BioNTech, DraftKings, and More Movers - Barron's

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Do you even realise that NASA could've hid or bury every single piece of evidence for a flat-earth and exaggerate their evidence? Have you ever question materialist scientific narratives?

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Exclusive | Longevity Is Now a Factor When Picking an Embryo for IVF - WSJ

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

Suspect in ‘King of the Hill’ actor’s death ‘immediately’ confessed: police - KTLA

Have the ability to visualize:

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

How Cocaine Hijacks the Brain - Neuroscience News

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

Is it possible for sisters to have different skin, hair colours, and hair types? E.g. hair= wavy, afro, straight, curly, black, brown, blonde, red. Skin colour: brown, peach, light brown and more.

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

PC: Google

Woodruff departs rehab outing after taking liner to elbow - MLB.com

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Which country has the best and strictest legal system in the world?

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

How many of you have had your parental rights taken away because of lies and no truth whatsoever, and did you prove the lies that were told about you to be false either through drug testing or another way, but still had your rights taken?

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

What kind of pleasure do gay men get from being bottom? The idea is very appealing to me but in practice it's quite painful.

PC: Google…my precious!

Actually have some literary skill:

Netflix and chill is a thing:

How do you identify a woman player?

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Many if not most, are in this category.

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

Entertainment.

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.